Home › Tools › The Retrieval Readiness Check
Free check · 6 items · 3 minutesIs your SEO programme measuring retrieval, or only ranking?
Six questions, then your numbers against ours. The check returns the state your programme is in and the one thing to do next — not a list of twenty things.
Our own numbers, measured on our own estate
Every figure below comes from a dated pull on our own property. One domain, one window — a case study, not a law. The value is in running it on yours.
| Measured | What it is |
|---|---|
| 14 of 17 | Top-10 pages with zero AI citationsOur own estate: 17 pages ranked in Google's top 10 (average position 10 or better), and 3 of them were cited by an AI engine. · Indexable, 7 September 2026, n = 223 pages |
| median 6.81 days, P90 37.10 days | How long citations lag publicationThis is the reason a 45-day evaluation window beats a 30-day one: at 30 days you are reading the lag, not the result. Third-party measurement, not ours — and we hold it second-hand, so treat it as directional. · Profound, 2026, as reported in LinkedIn's 2026 AI Search Visibility guide |
| at least 543 queries / 7,038 impressions | Page-one queries that earned zero clicks in 28 daysEight queries earned any click, and all eight were brand or navigational. "At least" is deliberate: the export caps at 500 rows per slice, so this is a floor, not a census. · Indexable, 28-day Search Console window to 6 September 2026 |
One domain, one window. Our own baseline the first time we ran this on ourselves was 2 of 6. A case study, not a law.
The gap list is the deliverable
If item 1 came back no, the first useful artefact is a list of your ranking pages that no engine quotes. That is what an AI search audit produces — by URL, with the passage-level reason attached.